RESURGENCE OF THE BANNED GAFATAR GROUP MOVEMENT IN PALOPO CITY SOUTH SULAWESI

Authors

  • Sitti Arafah National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
  • Sabara National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Aridllah Rahman National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v36i2.670

Keywords:

Gafatar, Messianic Religious Movement, Baiat

Abstract

This article delves into the resurgence of a banned group, Gafatar, in Palopo City. The group was officially banned by the government in 2016. The resurgence of this movement was known to the public when a video featuring the pledge of allegiance or baiat by three religious college students in Palopo City on November 9, 2020, went viral. The research employed a fact-finding method to uncover the details and underlying issues surrounding this pledge of allegiance. The research primarily focuses on establishing the timeline of events related to the pledge and identifying the religious group responsible for the incident. This study found the involvement of the ex-Gafatar group in the video, as the figures have beliefs and teachings similar to those of the group. This indicates that, despite being banned, the Gafatar group remains active in disseminating its beliefs and recruiting new members. The resurgence of Gafatar's activities poses a significant risk of triggering socio-religious issues within society, necessitating swift responses from relevant authorities.

References

Asrawijaya, Enkin. 2019. Gafatar and its Social Movement Dynamics. Sasdaya Journal Volume 03 Number 01. June 2019. Pp. 61 to 78.

Gerungan, A. 1998. Social Psychology. Jakarta: Eresco.

Imran. 2017. Construction of Messianism of Jamaah An-Nadzir in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi. Adabiyah Journal. Volume 17 Number 01. June 2017. Pp 81 to 108.

Mansyur, Abid. 2009. Contemporary Religious Dynamics. Yogyakarta: Media Creations.

Mufid, Ahmad Shafii, et al. 2017. Guidelines for Handling Problematic Religious Sects and Movements in Indonesia. Jakarta: Puslitbang Bimas Agama dan Layanan Agama Badan Rbang dan Diklat of the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia.

Munir, Misnal. 2004. Messianism in the Perspective of Historical Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy. Volume 36 Number 01. June 2004. Pp 42 to 59.

Nasrul, Koharuddin. 2006. Ahmad Mushaddeq and the Teachings of Al-Qiaydah Al-Islamiyah. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.

Piper, John. 2020. Christ and the Coronavirus. Surabaya: Perkantas East Java.

Reslawati. 2015. The Existence of Bahai Religion in Palopo, South Sulawesi. In Bahai, Sikh, Tao: Identity Strengthening and the Struggle for Sipiil Rights, Kustini (editor), Pp 81 to 132. Jakarta: Puslitbang Kehidupan Agama Badan Rbang dan Diklat of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.

Rosyid, Moh. 2017. Local Government Responsibility towards Former Members of the Fajar Nusantara Movement. Journal of Lekha Imagery. Volume 02 Number 02. December 2017. Pp 92 to 111.

Sabara. 2020. Religion with Moderates in the Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Mimicry. Volume 06 Number 02. December 2020. Pp 131 to 49.

Regards, Panis Dhbi. 2018. The Messianism Movement in Colonial Indonesia: A Theoretical Review. Jurtnal Citra Science. Volume 28 Number 01. June 2018. Pp 1 to 16.

Soekanto, Soedjono. 1982. Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI Press.

———. 2002. Role Theory. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sudrajat, Ajat. 1991. Messianism in Social Protest (The Case of Peasant Struggle in Java XIX and XX Centuries). Journal of Educational Horizons. Volume 10 Number 02. December 1991. Pp 93 to 104.

Research Team of Jakarta Religious Research and Development Center. 2016. The Role of Government in Handling Ex-Gafatar. Jakarta: Jakarta Religious Research and Development Center.

Wildan, Muhammad. 2019. "Gerakan Fajar Nusantara: Ideological Crisis and National Threat." Temali Journal. Volume 02 Number 01. June 2019. Pp 1 to 25.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

RESURGENCE OF THE BANNED GAFATAR GROUP MOVEMENT IN PALOPO CITY SOUTH SULAWESI. (2023). Penamas, 36(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v36i2.670